Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Mishan (T/A Emson) v Hozelock & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 871 Since Arnold LJ’s elevation to the Court of Appeal in 2019, he and Floyd LJ have heard about 11 cases together, spanning a mixture of areas of law, some patents cases and some not. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:46 am by johntfloyd
Indefinite Detention: Preemptive Punishment for Future Sex Crimes By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair On May 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:52 pm by johntfloyd
Abandoning Miranda in Terrorism Cases Contrary to Constitution and Beginning of Slippery Slope towards Neo-Con Police State By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair The United States Supreme Court in 1966 handed down Miranda v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
After residents of Floyd County, Kentucky sued NFC Mining, claiming the company damaged their homes, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London followed suit, literally. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm by johntfloyd
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Schneyder v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contractKito v Board of Educ. of William Floyd School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 08459, Decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentBernard J. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm by johntfloyd
The United States Supreme in 1984 handed down Strickland v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:45 pm by Kathryn Rubino
Then join WNYC’s All Things Considered host Jami Floyd for a conversation about Loving v. [read post]