Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 3:21 pm
The press had celebrated one case, Mills v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
The above issue, among several others, arose recently in the case of Teva v Merck, a judgment of Mr Justice Floyd from last week and available from BAILII here. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
That is the question raised by last month’s decision from Mr Justice Floyd in Omnipharm Ltd v Merial [2011] EWHC 3393 (Pat). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Our piece examined a November 2011 decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Morales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 11:07 am
Rule 702 Expert Testimony v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Had Hallen been cited at first instance, Sir Christopher Floyd considered that the trial judge may well have reached a different conclusion. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:32 pm
In McCullen v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:46 am
But his contempt decision in Patterson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:09 am
Luckett, December 2, 2015, Supreme Court of Montana More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Elias LJ gave the lead judgment, with which Lewison and Floyd LJJ agreed. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:22 am
Winfrey v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Baselines for Terry Stops In Floyd v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am
Canestraro’s petition failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 4:41 am
His 2017 win in Bristol Myers Squibb v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
