Search for: "FORD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
Sutter County, California Our client, Bryan D., purchased a 2004 Ford F-250 Super Duty truck from Larry Geweke Ford in Yuba City, California. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:24 pm
Earlier this week, Ford filed a petition for review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
The California Supreme Court has granted Ford's petition for review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:53 pm
A few weeks ago we blogged about the California Supreme Court's grant of review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:05 am
Ford has filed a reply in support of its petition for review to the California Supreme Court in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:55 am
Koh of the Northern District of California denied (in large part) Ford’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
In Yau v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:26 am
FordPlaintiff Asks California Supreme Court to Dismiss Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
Daniel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Today's opinion from the Fourth Appellate District, Division One, in San Diego holds Ford waived any claim to a new trial based on its argument that that the jury improperly imposed punitive damages to punish Ford for harm caused to nonparties.In the third of three recent California appellate decisions to confront the fallout from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:39 pm
See Edwards v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 11:50 am
On virtually every single point and cause of action.So if you purchased a (crappy) Ford Focus in California during the relevant time period, my guess is that you're going to get some relief at some point. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
Ford had a fair trial. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
The opinion in Nelson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Ford had appealed the jury's award, arguing that the punitive damage award was improper in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:21 pm
In a recent Northern District of California ruling, Judge Tigar found that the plaintiffs, owners and lessees of certain Ford Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner Hybrid vehicles, were entitled to attorney’s fees after Ford Motor Company issued a recall for the very component over which the plaintiffs had recently filed suit. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:56 pm
Ford. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
The case is Ford v. [read post]
