Search for: "FORD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1 - 20 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 2:24 pm
Earlier this week, Ford filed a petition for review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
The California Supreme Court has granted Ford's petition for review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:05 am
Ford has filed a reply in support of its petition for review to the California Supreme Court in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:55 am
Koh of the Northern District of California denied (in large part) Ford’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:26 am
FordPlaintiff Asks California Supreme Court to Dismiss Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Today's opinion from the Fourth Appellate District, Division One, in San Diego holds Ford waived any claim to a new trial based on its argument that that the jury improperly imposed punitive damages to punish Ford for harm caused to nonparties.In the third of three recent California appellate decisions to confront the fallout from the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 11:50 am
 On virtually every single point and cause of action.So if you purchased a (crappy) Ford Focus in California during the relevant time period, my guess is that you're going to get some relief at some point. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Ford had appealed the jury's award, arguing that the punitive damage award was improper in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:21 pm
In a recent Northern District of California ruling, Judge Tigar found that the plaintiffs, owners and lessees of certain Ford Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner Hybrid vehicles, were entitled to attorney’s fees after Ford Motor Company issued a recall for the very component over which the plaintiffs had recently filed suit. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
Ford, it may have set a new high for punitive damages in California. [read post]