Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Is it feasible for the judicial selection process to produce a formalist judiciary? [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Kevin Russell
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Similarly, Supreme Court providently dismissed plaintiff’s Judiciary Law § 487 claim in the fourth action. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Maroulis v Sari M Friedman, P.C., supra; see also Gumarova v Law Offe. of Paul A. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm by Matt Bodie
Friedman and Lithwick sometimes seem to claim that the Court is bound by past precedent, as in this exchange: Here's another example: Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:56 am by Lucie Gulino
Senator Friedman reintroduced the bill this year and it was referred to the Joint Committee on the Judiciary, but no legislative hearings have yet been scheduled. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:23 am
Leaving interpretation of constitutions, however, has been firmly embedded in U.S. jurisprudence since Marbury v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 7 September 2023, the High Court of Northern Ireland delivered judgment in the case of McGettigan v Mannok Holdings [2023] NIKB 90. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm by pfriedman
This belief is not so often or so clearly stated; but it underlies all that the Judiciary Committee now does with respect to Supreme Court nominations. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]