Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
So the case for the political value of formalism would have to rest on the idea that politicization of the judicial selection process and of the judiciary leads to very bad consequences—that politicizing Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Kevin Russell
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Maroulis v Sari M Friedman, P.C., supra; see also Gumarova v Law Offe. of Paul A. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm by Matt Bodie
Friedman and Lithwick sometimes seem to claim that the Court is bound by past precedent, as in this exchange: Here's another example: Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Consulting, Inc. v Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, 110 AD3d 550, 551 [1st Dept 2013]; Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435, 436 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In pleading his Judiciary Law § 487 claim, plaintiff failed to allege that defendants acted[*2]"with intent to deceive the court or any party" (id. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Answer: The increasing dominance of jurisdictional and statutory interpretation cases reflects a bare majority of the current Court’s and, in particular,  Chief Justice Roberts’s concern with limiting the role of the Court and federal judiciary. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Even the judiciary was placed under direct subservience to the military authorities. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
 Friedman argues that, rather than relying on the political branches alone to drive change, Obama should focus on building a strong judiciary to “ratify” those political changes. [read post]