Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The Courts however, are still working remotely, and updates on the Coronavirus guidance can be found on the Courts and Tribunal Judiciary The Law Society Gazette had a piece “LCJ: ‘No going back’ to pre-Covid ways”. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am
The motion court correctly found that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation because plaintiff’s claimed losses resulted from defendants’ unauthorized withdrawal of her appeal and not from their purported false statements as to their [*2]ability to handle administrative proceedings (see Friedman v Anderson, 23 AD3d 163, 167 [1st Dept 2005]. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Answer: The increasing dominance of jurisdictional and statutory interpretation cases reflects a bare majority of the current Court’s and, in particular, Chief Justice Roberts’s concern with limiting the role of the Court and federal judiciary. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:30 am
Even the judiciary was placed under direct subservience to the military authorities. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
 Friedman argues that, rather than relying on the political branches alone to drive change, Obama should focus on building a strong judiciary to “ratify†those political changes. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
In a post at the Ninth Justice, Dan Friedman reports that the Senate Judiciary Committee is moving towards scheduling Kagan’s confirmation hearing. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 18, 2023 Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 18, 2023 Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 11, 2023 Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Higgitt, JJ. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 11, 2023 Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Higgitt, JJ. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
Richard Friedman described the event in the Journal of Supreme Court History. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 8:53 am
These amendments were required by the recent United States Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:05 pm
See Kasmer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
At NYU Law, Barry Friedman explains the Supreme Court confirmation “dance-a-thon. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
The first involves the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, which was upheld in Stuart v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
Four years later, the U.S Supreme Court responded bravely and echoed her sentiment in Roe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm
Are Wolpoff & Abramson, Mann Bracken and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, providing only legal services to debt buyer clients or do they have a stake in the litigation which may be in violation of the Judiciary Law? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
