Search for: "FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Josh Wright
 Supreme Court said it will decide whether states can block antitrust scrutiny of hospital mergers such as Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:50 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., involved the acquisition by Phoebe Putney Health System (PPHS), a nonprofit corporation formed under Georgia’s hospital authorities law, of another hospital in the same county. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:50 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., involved the acquisition by Phoebe Putney Health System (PPHS), a nonprofit corporation formed under Georgia’s hospital authorities law, of another hospital in the same county. [read post]
(“Palmyra”) and the subsequent lease of Palmyra to Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:28 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., No. 11-12906, will appear in CCH Trade Regulation Reporter. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. (663 F.3d 1369, (CCH) 2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,722). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., Case No. 1:11-cv-58 (WLS), will appear at CCH 2011-1 Trade Cases ¶77,508. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:57 am by Christine Nielsen
Phoebe Putney Health Systems, Inc., the Supreme Court rejected an expansive view of the state-action immunity doctrine articulated by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:21 pm
The FTC alleged that a local hospital authority’s purchase of Palmyra Park Hospital’s assets from HCA, Inc. and subsequent lease to Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:38 pm
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., Dkt. 11-1160, is available here on the FTC website. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:20 am by Jeffrey May
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., Dkt. 11-1160, was granted on June 25, 2012. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:35 am by Howard Ullman
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., 663 F.3d 1369 (11th Cir. 2011), the Court will take up the question of whether a hospital acquisition is immunized from antitrust scrutiny by virtue of the state action doctrine. [read post]