Search for: "FULSOM v. FULSOM" Results 1 - 20 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2018, 8:48 am
We offer some quick observations from recent REIT deal activity, with a more fulsome discussion in our attached updated playbook: N A V are the three most misunderstood letters in the REIT lexicon, often viewed doubly incorrectly as both a floor for what a sale process should yield, and an indicator of opportunities for activists. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 9:00 am by Edward M. McNally
Dieckman v Regency GP LP,  No. 208, 2016 (January 20, 2017) Agreements for publicly-traded limited partnerships often disclaim any fiduciary duties and provide safe harbors for transactions involving a conflict for the controller. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:08 am
Although the AmeriKat is only just digesting the judgment, there are treats in store for everyone including:What is the the role of Teva v Leo? [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by Eric S. Solotoff
This was true until February 21, 2024, when the Appellate Division released the unreported (non-precedential) decision in Geary v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by Bexis
  That was a tickler; we promised you a more fulsome discussion of the opinion later. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 1:11 am by Mark Summerfield
  One further step in that direction was taken by the Canadian Supreme Court on 30 June 2017, when it banished the so-called ‘Promise Doctrine’ of inutility from Canadian patent law: AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc 2017 SCC 36. [read post]