Search for: "Falco v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 4:27 am
Hunsecker (Burt Lancaster)'s advice to Sidney Falco (Tony Curtis) in the noir classic Sweet Smell of Success more appropriate? [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Yesterday, Advocate General Trstenjak`s opinion in case C-533/07 (Falco Privatstiftung und Rabitsch) was published. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
On 19 December 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its ruling in Corman-Collins SA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 9:23 am by Victoria Clark
Department of State called the lawsuit “baseless. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
As both state and non-state hackers continue to launch cyberattacks at the U.S., Gregory Falco and Herb Lin examined what it might mean for “hacking back”—defined broadly as a counter-cyberattack against the initial attacker’s computer—to be considered a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
; Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property and State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the New York Convention of 2004. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
A sign of how parlous the state of funding is within local authorities these days. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:42 am
 It did not, therefore, refer to the ECJ's observation in para. 28 of its judgment in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) that: [T]he rules of the Brussels Convention on exclusive jurisdiction or express prorogation of jurisdiction are also likely to be applicable to legal relationships involving only one Contracting State and one or more non-Contracting States. [read post]