Search for: "Fallen v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 1:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Holder litigation is the extent to which the United States had flexibility to tailor the protection of existing works that had fallen in the public domain when it joined the Berne Convention. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:55 am by Randolph Rice
Your accident may have involved a fallen tree that was owned by a government entity, such as a federal, state, or local agency. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Shea Denning
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:53 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, a case from the Untied States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, claimant applied for disability benefits from the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) in February 2012. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
In the beginning...or 1977, law firm marketing in the United States was born with the Supreme Court decision in the case of Bates v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:04 pm by Jon Katz
As a Fairfax criminal lawyer, I know that it is common throughout the United States to criminalize fully baring female breasts other than for breast feeding. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
I hadn't noticed until today that the Army Litigation Division lawyer who is "of counsel" for the United States in the Gray v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:33 pm by Mark Summerfield
On 9 May 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued its opinion in Oracle America, Inc v Google Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by NCC Staff
On June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court issued its Loving v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Moura v Cunha, the mother allowed a friend, Cunha, allegedly, the child's godmother, to bring the child, Luana, from Brazil, her country of residence, to the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court declared Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statutes unconstitutional, overturning Pace v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 Now the proportion of of successful invalidity claims has fallen and at present around 55% of patent claims survive. [read post]