Search for: "Falls v. Falls"
Results 1 - 20
of 27,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 6:29 pm
Ross v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:52 am
In Fenimore v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:53 pm
However, the jury of the Hendrickson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 12:58 am
The plaintiff also must show that the object fell because of the absence or inadequacy of a safety device of the kind enumerated in the statute.Case: Flossos v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:04 am
In Woodgett v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 4:45 am
Falling concrete blocks.The Second Department reinstated plaintiff's cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 241(6), in Amerson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:54 am
Additional Resources: Alcala v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:26 pm
The sky is NOT falling: Oracle v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:56 am
In a recent case, Hall v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:51 am
The relevant inquiry is whether the harm flows directly from the application of the force of gravity to the object.Case: Andresky v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:48 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:28 am
So, the Appellate Division determined that defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the sidewalk was not in a hazardous condition and that the injured plaintiff's fall was not proximately caused by its negligence in failing to remedy the defect.As defendant did not establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, there was no need to review the sufficiency of the plaintiffs' opposition papers.Student note: A plaintiff's inability to identify the… [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:17 pm
Case:Carolyn Wood, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Falls to Lowest Level Since Roe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:23 am
The record shows that defendant's supervisor of grounds inspected the exterior lights several days prior to plaintiff's fall and found them to be functioning properly, and plaintiff did not submit any contradictory evidence.Case: Vidal v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
” Additionally, in a recent decision entitled Bauers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:05 am
If the defendant fails to meet its prima facie burden, the court need not consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff's opposition papers.Case: Campbell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:57 pm
Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:45 pm
Case: Daugharty v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:26 pm
The sky is NOT falling: Oracle v. [read post]
