Search for: "Famous Smith v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
The story is told in: Ross Thomson, Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States 1790-1865 (2009); Alexander Rose, American Rifle: A Biography (2008); David R. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
United States Kanye West’s music video for “Famous” has sparked outrage for portraying naked celebrities in bed, in the form of life-like wax figures, and IPKat has looked at whether those portrayed can use publicity rights. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Cal. 2015) -by the way a similar case with the famous street artist REVOK in the role of the plaintiff- has held that the plain language of Section 1202 refers to CMI a [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
It was not until 2006 with the celebrity, Anna Nicole Smith case that came before the United States Supreme Court that the Court expounded on the federal probate exception in any meaningful regards. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
What better blogpost is there to start the week with than Katfriend Alberto Bellan's famous round-up of the previous week's Katposts? [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:47 am
Under the famous decision in Miranda v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Kohr’s lawsuit sparked comparison to the famous 1994 Liebeck v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
"Judge Learned Hand United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitInspiration or appropriation? [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
