Search for: "Famous Smith v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Cal. 2015) -by the way a similar case with the famous street artist REVOK in the role of the plaintiff- has held that the plain language of Section 1202 refers to CMI a [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
It was not until 2006 with the celebrity, Anna Nicole Smith case that came before the United States Supreme Court that the Court expounded on the federal probate exception in any meaningful regards. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
What better blogpost is there to start the week with than Katfriend Alberto Bellan's famous round-up of the previous week's Katposts? [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:47 am
Under the famous decision in Miranda v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Kohr’s lawsuit sparked comparison to the famous 1994 Liebeck v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
"Judge Learned Hand United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitInspiration or appropriation? [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office reached a decision on March 25th . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
The primary one is the famous Ten Commandments lecture by Irving Younger. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
Martin Zilber v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
But these handguns were more popular in Europe and in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The Court saw that case – United States v. [read post]
