Search for: "Famous Smith v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office reached a decision on March 25th . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
The primary one is the famous Ten Commandments lecture by Irving Younger. [read post]
4 May 2014, 12:15 pm
Or take the most famous collection of third party data, the one that got this debate rolling – NSA’s collection of the metadata for all calls touching the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Again, in the past we have distinguished between collection in the United States and abroad,[20] but location seems to be harder and harder to determine in real time. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Ken
Judge Gadbois' opinion arose from the famous Supreme Court case Huster v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by Buce
  Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]