Search for: "Faretta v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2024, 7:49 am
Faretta v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Hamlin: Defendant cannot be sentenced to jail unless offered appointment of counsel. 1975 Faretta v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
California, and must do so in timely fashion. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
Supreme Court case Faretta v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:42 am
California, violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
Tamplin v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:15 am
* See Faretta v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:03 am
Second, although the Court has held that a defendant has the constitutional right to represent himself in Faretta v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:43 pm
See Faretta v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Ryan then stated that the statement in question is to be admitted against all five defendants and was not constitutionally doubtful; it was made in front of Judge Kohlmann when the defendants were representing themselves pro se under Faretta v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
"In the master calendar court, on the date set for trial, appellant exercised his right to represent himself under Faretta v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
Burton v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:38 am
On May 7, 2014, the court conducted a hearing pursuant to Faretta v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:51 am
The court may not leave a criminal defendant without counsel unless it complies with the procedure described in Faretta v. [read post]
