Search for: "Faretta v. California"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Rodgers12-382Issue: Whether Faretta v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
Day, 233 Conn. 813, 828, 661 A.2d 539 (1995), quoting Faretta v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lambert, No. 05-99011Denial of habeas relief from a conviction and death sentence for the first-degree murders of petitioner's wife and business partner is affirmed as: 1) a state court's holding that the trial court did not violate Faretta v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
Timothy Howard v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
As a result of this judgment, Martin claims that his rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct a Faretta (Faretta v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
As a result of this judgment, Martin claims that his rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct a Faretta (Faretta v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
California, and must do so in timely fashion. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Madigan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
RodgersIssue: Whether Faretta v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
Third, in Price v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
(Digital Fingerprint: 6078ca7b0cf32cfc1b5b4c1d33749c80)Endnotes: Faretta v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Bond v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
