Search for: "Farley v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am by gmlevine
Paul Farley, D2008-0008 (WIPO February 2, 2008) (she “offers bondage, discipline and sado-masochism services … to customers in the San Francisco Bay and Washington D.C. areas of the United States”) is known by her stage name “Anna Dior”, hence she passes her legitimacy test for . [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
- APRA to continue licensing music for public performances on condition it allows option of dealing directly with music publishers (IP Whiteboard) Sorbent brand success leads to trade mark victory (IP Whiteboard) Not complying with an injunction – FCA decision in Deckers Outdoor Corporation Pty Ltd v Farley (ipwars.com) Aussies drive logos, imagery from ciggie boxes? [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
(smiles)" Sotomayor is starting to look like a guest on the Chris Farley show, with Kaufman playing Chris Farley. 12:59: Who knew, an interesting question from Kaufman. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
Read the Republican lawmakers' brief here: U S v Farley Amicus Brief.pdf [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): State of Indiana v. [read post]