Search for: "Farnsworth v. Farnsworth" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 11:26 am by Ward Farnsworth
    So let's take as an example a case that I've mentioned in a previous reply:  Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Strict Liability 37 & 38 & 39: Animals, Rylands v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With respect to the specific Article 10 provision at issue in this proceeding, Section 10.07(c), in 2010, in State of New York v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:19 pm by PaulKostro
(quoting Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 8.16, at 497 (2d ed.1998)). [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:59 am
Knowing that I was headed back to the dome for game 3 of the Yanks v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:14 pm
A case in point: if an auto manufacturer has met federal design minimums (remember, they can always design a product more safely than the minimum standards dictate), the manufacturer will say that the government has "approved" the design, and that it shouldn't be subject to litigation if the design proves faulty, regardless whether the design failure involves exploding gas tanks, failing seat belts ( see our litigation against GM about this Farnsworth v. [read post]