Search for: "Farrell v. Kramer" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Kramer, Saint Mary’s College: The Utility of Law-Related Examples in Communication Education. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"[A] requirement of evidence of authenticity...applies to all writings whose relevancy depends upon authorship by a particular person" (Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 9-101 [Farrell 11th Ed]). [read post]