Search for: "Farris v. Farris" Results 1 - 20 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:16 am by Michael Oykhman
Additionally, where an accused knows about certain evidence and denies any knowledge, an intent to mislead is established (see: Farris v The Queen, 1965 CanII 201 (ONCA)) Furthermore, as per R v Prashad, 2004 CanLII 34382 (ONCA) the Crown does not need to prove that the accused lied about a matter which is actually fact, only that he gave evidence that he knew to be dishonest with an intent to mislead the court. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:16 pm by Jon Sands
Burke, No. 17-35446 (12-2-19)(Bea w/Farris & Christen). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by Jon Sands
Gobert, No. 17-35970 (11-26-19)(Bea w/Farris & Christen). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
Farris argued on behalf of the petitioners in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]