Search for: "Fauna v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
However, the negative declaration inexplicably stated that ‘[t]he proposed action will not result in the removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
However, the negative declaration inexplicably stated that ‘[t]he proposed action will not result in the removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 4:11 am
Under the "Habitats Directive", Council Directive 92/43/EC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, each member State must propose a list of important ecological sites to the Commission. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 2:53 pm
Last year, I commented on the case of Maloof v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As a contribution to the Issue on the fiftieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Carved African ivory seized by US Fish and Wildlife in the case against Victor Gordon..Source: USFWSPlea negotiations continue in the case of United States v. [read post]