Search for: "Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Generes" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
  The 1993 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure created an automatic right to conduct depositions of expert witnesses[8]. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  “Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2]   In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., Lituanian Commerce Corp., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Federal District Court for the Norther District of Iowa decided that the EEOC had failed to reasonably investigate before bringing charges against a trucking company. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
    When a federally insured bank is closed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) is appointed as conservator or receiver. [read post]