Search for: "Federal Employment Law Insider" Results 81 - 100 of 1,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 6:35 pm
 Each child chops 4 percent off a woman’s hourly wages, according to a 2014 analysis by a sociologist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.The article describes what many will find as examples that ring all too true or familiar.There are remedies: both federal and Kentucky state law prohibit pregnancy discrimination and provide for legal claims when it occurs.Lexington, Kentucky discrimination lawyer Robert Abell represents individuals and employees in… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Dept. of Education will be open more than one 48-hour period per year [Frederick Hess and Grant Addison, AEI] Spot the logical flaw: claim that Janus and Masterpiece Cakeshop cases could combine to create new First Amendment right for public school teachers to strike [Andrew Strom, On Labor] Eighth Circuit: federal labor law doesn’t protect workers against firing over IWW flyer-posting campaign falsely claiming restaurant’s food is unsafe [Daniel Pasternak,… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  They should also know and understand all applicable state-specific and federal laws governing employment law matters. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:54 am by Tom Crane
 Here are a few of the more common employment law myths I encounter. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:14 am by William McGrath
Today, the Federal Securities Law Blog takes a look back at the last 30 days in the federal securities world in a regular feature which appears on approximately the 15th of each month. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Grove's bill, if passed, will prohibit PA municipalities from "requiring an employer to provide an employee or class of employees with vacation or other forms of leave from employment, paid or unpaid, that is not required by Federal or State law, and may not require an employer to compensate an employee for any vacation or other forms of leave for which Federal or State law does not require the employee to be compensated." [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Prosecutors charged violations of federal wire fraud, securities fraud, and conversion statutes, codified at 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:14 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
Juanita Beecher, of counsel with Fortney & Scott and an editor of Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:27 pm by Brett Holubeck
Robin Shea, at the Employment & Labor Insider,  does a great job of outlining them. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:26 am by Frances L. Kenajian
Under federal law, as well as the law of many states, cities, and municipalities, sexual harassment is considered a type of prohibited gender discrimination. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:48 pm by Lisa Law View
Age and salary are not the only things which are covered over federal laws. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Tawny L. Alvarez
This is the first in a series of posts from Verrill with the purpose of helping to dispel myths that are currently circulating concerning employment laws and rules related to COVID-19. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm by Charla Bizios Stevens
The case should be of concern to businesses which pay individuals fully or primarily by commission, especially in the retail context or in automobile sales where the ruling departs sharply from federal law. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:00 pm by Elizabeth Connellan Smith
Navigating the complexities of employment law is difficult, but it is what we do here at the Verrill Dana Employment Group. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:48 am by Jon Hyman
Under Ohio law, the termination of an at-will employee that jeopardizes a clear public policy articulated in the Ohio or United States Constitutions, federal or state statutes, administrative rules and regulations, or common law creates a cause of action for wrongful discharge in violation of that public policy. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:09 pm by GPMfeeds
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”), a national investor rights law firm, continues its investigation on behalf of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (“Pilgrim’s Pride” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: PPC) investors concerning the Company and its officers’ possible violations of the federal securities laws. [read post]