Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense LLC et al" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   CASE STYLE: State of Texas v Samara Portfolio Management, LLC et al; Cause No. 2013-35721 in the 80th Judicial District Court of Texas (Harris County)    [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm by Thomas James
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has suggested that gener [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC… [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am by Abby Meyer
Bayer Healthcare et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00102 (N.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellee SmileDirectClub, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Dwayne Edwards, et al., No. 17-cv-393 (D.N.J. filed Jan. 20, 2017),  SEC litigator Lee Greenwood filed a January 4, 2019 letter with a federal court in New Jersey informing the judge that the SEC beli [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]