Search for: "Feinstein v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am
While the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for fraud, it is time barred. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Dianne Feinstein of California – grilled her on the role of her Catholic faith in judging. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked Barr about his defense of George W. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:30 am
United States (June 22, 2018). [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am
“Levine, Henick Feinstein, and Moritt Hock each contend that this cause of action is time~ barred. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
And the Justice Department obtained another FARA conviction in May, in the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
One of the term’s major cases was Janus v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) proposes to regulate social media bots, or to put it differently, to regulate a form of speech carried on through automated mechanisms [John Samples, Cato] “The State of New Jersey Wants to Subsidize News. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:02 am
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” (I do not accept this framework in all of its respects—especially the conclusion that an elected official is barred from taking “purely partisan” actions—but I will work with it here.) [read post]