Search for: "Feist v. Feist" Results 1 - 20 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 8:21 am by Media Law Prof
Miriam Bitton, Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Law, has published Protection for Informational Works after Feist Publications Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:29 pm
Here is the abstract:In the 1991 case of Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:15 pm by Ron Coleman
RT @CopyrightLaw: Exclusive Rights: “11th Cir. finds medical forms lack sufficient originality; rejects Feist standard” RT @CopyrightLaw: Goldman: “Rare Ruling on Damages for Sending Bogus Copyright Takedown Notice–Lenz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:57 am by Lon Sobel
The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal features these articles (in Volume IX Book 3): Moral Rights and Supernatural Fiction: Authorial Dignity and the New Moral Rights Agendas Not that There’s Anything Wrong with That: Imputations of Homosexuality and the Normative Structure of Defamation Law Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:15 am by Cole Carlson
Ownership of a valid copyright requires that the work be independently created by the author and have some “minimal degree of creativity,” as required by Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:53 am by Nedim Malovic
In particular, the US Supreme Court in Feist considered that creative ways of selecting, coordinating, or arranging uncopyrightable material will trigger copyright.Furthermore, in Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
In the seminal copyright case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:36 pm by Ron Coleman
RT @CopyrightLaw: Exclusive Rights: “11th Cir. finds medical forms lack sufficient originality; rejects Feist standard” RT @CopyrightLaw: Goldman: “Rare Ruling on Damages for Sending Bogus Copyright Takedown Notice–Lenz v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
Nonetheless, according to Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) a work that combines non-protectable elements into a larger design may be registered if the overall design is sufficiently creative. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:15 am by Cole Carlson
Ownership of a valid copyright requires that the work be independently created by the author and have some “minimal degree of creativity,” as required by Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 9:56 am
Finally, UEFA argued that the Office’s assessment was not in line with US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist).The legal framework and the CORB assessmentPursuant to Section 102a of the US Copyright Act (USC), a work may be registered if it qualifies as an original work of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:34 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” That does not mean that mere “sweat of the brow” is enough to claim protection of a compilation by copyright, as explained by the Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/hrhDHmkcVh -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:25 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)), the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]