Search for: "Feist v. Feist" Results 21 - 40 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
The Board drew upon the instructive language of Satava v Lowry, 323 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2003): … a combination of unprotectable elements may qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
The leading case in compilation analysis is Feist Publications Inc v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm by Ingrid Mattson
Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Feist Publications v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
 Here, the standard of originality as set out in Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 9:38 am
Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:04 pm
I also said:"As an alternative holding, the court, without much analysis, followed the First Circuit in Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 2:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
After all, similar fictions were included in the phonebook that the Supreme Court found to lack originality in the leading case defining the limits of copyrightability for compilations, Feist v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s about computation, compression, individual works—a work is only as complex as its shortest encoding.Tentative idea #1: Feist says there are hundreds of millions of ways to select 50,000 listings; about 1,500,000 bits to describe an arbitrary selection—but it’s a lot easier to describe Feist’s actual selection, and that is an indicator of lack of original creativity.Tentative idea #3: quantify factor 3: a compressed image could be seen as… [read post]