Search for: "Feist v. Feist"
Results 61 - 80
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
” Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
One reason Oracle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
We express no opinion on whether these works are sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection, see Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
”[22] [1] Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
”[22] [1] Star Athletic, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
E-Discovery * Feist v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:46 am
, v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:17 am
In Mazer v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:22 am
, v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:27 am
There the answer tends to be more straightforward as you cannot copyright collection of facts (see cases such as Publications International and Feist). [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
” That does not mean that mere “sweat of the brow” is enough to claim protection of a compilation by copyright, as explained by the Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Feist Publications v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Puts Office at odds with CDN v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
To be sure, this creativity is minimal, but it satisfies the Feist test. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
In addition, Feist Publications v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:30 pm
Tattoos also satisfy the “minimal degree of creativity” requirement set by the Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
