Search for: "Feist v. Feist" Results 81 - 100 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2017, 6:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of course, under the (circuit) law of AGU v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:23 pm
 Also, a list of items, each unprotectable alone, may be protected as an original selection and arrangement under Feist v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
 Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:27 am by Andres
There the answer tends to be more straightforward as you cannot copyright collection of facts (see cases such as Publications International and Feist). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 7:08 am by Brian A. Hall
” The Court relied heavily upon the Supreme Court case of Feist Publ’n, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:27 pm
Compare this situation to  LANS v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:33 pm by Bob Ambrogi
“To state a copyright claim, Plaintiffs need allege only ‘(1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original,'” the brief says, citing the seminal copyright case, Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm by christopher
Borland, Int’l, Inc., 49 F.3d 807, 813 (1st Cir. 1995), citing Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]