Search for: "Feldman v. Keene" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 7:36 am by Marc DeGirolami
  Is Feldman saying that had the Justices understood what it's like to be President, they wouldn't have ruled the way they did in Clinton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:13 am
Strongly or painfully affecting the feelings; intense, keen; painful, poignant. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
  And in a column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses what the unanimous results in yesterday’s decisions might mean for King v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
” Coverage of the recent reenactment in Philadelphia of a 1794 Supreme Court case, Georgia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen notes that “statistically speaking, on LGBT-related cases only, the votes by [Chief Justice John] Roberts and [Justice Neil] Gorsuch put them into a middle ground. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am by David Mead, University of East Anglia
If the Court is keen to preserve its subsidiary role, some better indicia for national courts and police would have been of greater assistance. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the role of lawyers in Supreme Court decision making. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda was Byrd v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen writes that “[w]hile LGBT people nervously await the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
For Keen News Service, Lisa Keen previews three cases the court may consider during the upcoming term that “could have significant impact on prospects for equal protection for LGBT people. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen looks at where the five “stand on LGBT-related concerns. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” In his column for Bloomberg, Noah Feldman argues that an appeals court decision interpreting last term’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Rene Blocker reports on American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]