Search for: "Felts v. Murphy"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
Even U.S. partners and allies felt that the U.S. had enjoyed monopolypower in the Middle East for two long, and competition would benefit them.In this, China had a great deal to offer. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am
Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
Defining Responsible Use After ChatGPT made its debut November 2022, mounting questions of responsible and accountable oversight triggered sufficient unease such that the MIT Task Force, consisting of both legal practitioners and academics, felt necessary to convene on ways to offer direction around responsible use of generative AI. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
Judge Murphy dissented from the grant of certiorari and would have found jurisdiction under Jonas. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of McClure v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:28 am
The case is Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
Indeed, they have not even felt the need to ask which is the better reading. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:58 pm
They simply felt differently about the decision three years later. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:29 pm
In Candida Krezelak v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:31 am
In Coster v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Prior to the release of Murphy’s letter, GSA stated, “An ascertainment has not yet been made. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
The leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to freedom of expression at Irish law are Irish Times v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1998] 2 ILRM 161 (2 April 1998) (doc | pdf) and Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, [1998] 2 ILRM 360 (28 May 1998) (doc | pdf) (which I have considered here); but the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation context.… [read post]
