Search for: "Felts v. Murphy" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm by Will Baude
Then in late March, the Supreme Court granted a stay of execution in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:58 pm by Allie
Murphy, 406 F.3d 857 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
” “The district court explained that the record supported the inference that the DeCosters had ‘created a work environment where employees not only felt comfortable disregarding regulations and bribing USDA officials, but may have even felt pressure to do so,’” Murphy wrote. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]