Search for: "Fentis v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
Younger v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 6:36 am
Source: Crime & Justice News
"The gun-control case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:10 am
Forever 21, Inc.: Puma’s “Fenty” Slides May Not Have the Traction for the Uphill Battle Against Forever 21Jessica Cohen-NowakCommentary: Cartwheeling Through Copyright Law: Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
The state of Georgia initially classified cars as “ferocious animals. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 20 Abbott v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
The case in question was Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, decided in the Court of Appeal in the early days of 2015, which dealt with the sale of a simple article of clothing; a t-shirt. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" Farrell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Supreme Court held in CBOCS West, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:54 am
Senator Says Re-banning Animal Crush Videos 'A Virtual Certainty' A speedy Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this morning paid notice to animal rights groups that hope to flatten a resurgence of "animal crush" videos, an industry they say has regained ground after the United States v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
United States (D.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:46 am
The photographer brought a claim against Hadid [Peter Cepeda v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
It didn’t please everyone though and the tournament stated that as of next year there will be a dress code policy. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
” This position was confirmed recently by the Court of Appeal (CA) in Fenty v Arcadia, who upheld Rihanna’s $5 million claim in passing off against the British fashion retailer, Topshop, but denied the existence of an image right under English law. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
In Arcadia v Fenty all judges described the case as borderline, because Rihanna had no property in the image as such, her right was in the goodwill in the business of endorsement, and that goodwill was affected by the use of the image. [read post]
