Search for: "Feres v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which bars servicemembers from suing the federal government for personal injuries related to their military service, Stephen Vladeck, in an op-ed for The New York Times, urges Congress to overturn the Feres doctrine “in its entirety. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which gave the Justices a chance they apparently don’t need to overturn Feres v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
A federal court can sometimes issue a writ of habeas corpus due to the violation of a federal statute in addition to the violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
If a lawfully admitted permanent resident is removable from the United States, he may seek cancellation of removal if, among other things, he has “resided in the United States continuously for 7 years after having been admitted in any status. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am by Florian Mueller
It needs to be taken into consideration that monetary compensation is the norm, not a rare exception, in the real world as far as the technology sector (from chipsets to cars) is concerned.In the United States, the fact that someone licensed a patent doesn't necessarily preclude the patent holder from being granted injunctive relief. [read post]