Search for: "Ferrara v. State" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
  In its March 26, 2009 opinion, the appellate court rejected this argument and upheld the injunction, writing: While both Supreme Court and this Court previously determined that questions of fact preclude summary judgment in the parties' related case (Patton v Ferrara, 46 AD3d at 1205), plaintiff has still established a likelihood of success here. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
Sobota, Esq. of Ferrara, Fiorenza, Larrison, Barrett & Reitz, for sending it a copy of Justice Reed’s opinion.NYPPL Comments: Over the years NYPPL has summarized a number of cases involving employees alleged to have been involved with pornography while at work or using the employer's computers for such activities.These include a case involving “Irresistible impulse” as a defense [Perry v Comm. of Labor, 283 A.D.2d 754].Readers may recall that in the 1959… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Chair: Professor Blanca Vilà Costa Opening session: 15:30-17:00 Pietro Franzina, Associate Professor of international law, University of Ferrara, The competence of the European Union regarding the Administration, including the Denunciation, of International Conventions concluded by Member States. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:17 am by CMLP Staff
This right has been recognized in jurisdictions outside of New York,25 and would trump any state law that would otherwise prohibit such recording.  [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
 In a prize promotion, a seller or telemarketer must disclose: (i) the odds of winning, (ii) that no purchase is necessary, (iii) how to enter without a purchase, and (v) any material costs or conditions to receive the prize. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:48 am by Neil Cahn
In its June 17, 2020 decision in Matter of Abramson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]