Search for: "Ferraro v. Ferraro" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm by Daily Record Staff
Ferraro was not entitled to interest with respect to tax refunds issued for tax years ... [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:59 am
Such was the reaffirmation in Ferraro v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:44 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions Body: SC19043 - Ferraro v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:37 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions Body: Below is today's tort law Appellate Court opinion: AC30239 - Hodgate v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
Debunking Ferraro The other leading case about special skills was the Full Court of the Family Court case of Ferraro. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from her position, the Appellate Division opined that notwithstanding Plaintiff's "previously unblemished record ... her identified pedagogical shortcomings, lack of improvement, and student safety issues inherent in two of the sustained misconduct charges, the penalty of termination does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Ferraro v Farina, 156 AD3d 549, leave to appeal denied, 32 NY3d 902. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from her position, the Appellate Division opined that notwithstanding Plaintiff's "previously unblemished record ... her identified pedagogical shortcomings, lack of improvement, and student safety issues inherent in two of the sustained misconduct charges, the penalty of termination does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Ferraro v Farina, 156 AD3d 549, leave to appeal denied, 32 NY3d 902. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, to the extent the Supreme Court directs that arrears be paid in installments, the plaintiff is entitled to interest on the unpaid outstanding balances at the statutory rate in accordance with CPLR 5004 and Greenberg v Greenberg and Ferraro v Ferraro. [read post]