Search for: "Ferreira v. City of Binghamton" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm by lennyesq
*** The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York’s ” ‘special duty’ requirement” applies “to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence” or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality’s negligent “failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee” (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In the words of the Appellate Division, "Contrary to the [Plaintiff's] contention, [Plaintiff] failed to allege that the Town voluntarily assumed a special duty to him beyond that owed to the general public, citing  Maldovan v County of Erie, 39 NY3d 166, and Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In the words of the Appellate Division, "Contrary to the [Plaintiff's] contention, [Plaintiff] failed to allege that the Town voluntarily assumed a special duty to him beyond that owed to the general public, citing  Maldovan v County of Erie, 39 NY3d 166, and Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]