Search for: "Ferreira v. City of Binghamton"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm
*** The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York’s ” ‘special duty’ requirement” applies “to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence” or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality’s negligent “failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee” (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:03 am
City of Binghamton, issued on September 23. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
City of Binghamton. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:40 am
City of Binghamton, issued on September. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
