Search for: "Ferrigno v. Ferrigno" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Ferrigno v County of Suffolk   [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 11:33 pm by John Diekman
Work constitutes routine maintenance when it involves replacing components that, in the course of normal wear and tear, require replacement.Student note: To prevail on a cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1), a plaintiff must establish that the injury occurred while erecting, demolishing, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning, or pointing a building or structure.Case:  Ferrigno v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the attorney’s negligence” (Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329; see Ferrigno [*2]v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d at 652; Marino v Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salibury & Cambria, LLP, 87 AD3d 566). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To meet their initial burden on that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants were required to “demonstrate, prima facie, either that they did not breach their duty to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession or that any breach of that duty did not proximately cause the plaintiff to suffer actual and ascertainable damages” (Montero v Cohen, 104… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 164 AD3d 809, 814; Balan v Rooney, 152 AD3d 733, 734; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 654; Federico v Brancato, 144 AD3d 965, 967). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 164 AD3d 809, 814; Balan v Rooney, 152 AD3d 733, 734; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 654; Federico v Brancato, 144 AD3d 965, 967). [read post]