Search for: "Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co." Results 1 - 20 of 510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Mack Sperling
And the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a fiduciary duty claim against a bank in Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:22 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
It is possible, of course, for a trust to have two or more co-trustees and an estate to have two or more co-personal representatives. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:08 pm by Greg Daugherty
State Street Bank & Trust Co., the Sixth Circuit held that an ESOP fiduciary’s investment decisions satisfy the ERISA duty of prudence so long as the fiduciary uses a prudent process when the decisions are made. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Hillary Frommer
All too often co-fiduciaries do not see eye to eye in the administration of an estate or trust. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
State Street Bank and Trust Co., 137 F.3d 12, 18 (1st Cir. 1998). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:43 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
If you were going to read just one ERISA decision this year – or were starting from scratch, with a blank slate, and wanted to know the law governing breach of fiduciary duty claims under ERISA – I would read this one, Judge Holwell of the Southern District of New York’s opinion in Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Co. v. [read post]