Search for: "Field v. Clark" Results 41 - 60 of 408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Volokh Conspiracy Professor Randy Barnett is, according to both the Goldfarb and Professors briefs, a pioneer in the field of corpus linguistics. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:26 am by Lydia Estep
Kasubhai said that Avery Dennison owed Clarke McAllister’s ADASA Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
Whilst it had been submitted by opposing counsel that Wenman may have exaggerated this figure, HHJ Clarke went so far as to suggest that even if only 5% or 1% of her work was attributable to Archangel Alchemy (though HHJ Clarke considered on the evidence that it was more than that), this would be more than trivial and would have generated sufficient actual goodwill to be capable of damage by reason of a misrepresentation.HHJ Clarke dismissed claims that ‘The… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 3:59 pm by Emily Dai
Clarke considered the long-term future of Afghanistan. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am by Arturo Jara
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax  Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
”James Fields’ lawyers sought mitigation by stressing his history of mental illness. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]