Search for: "Fields v. Eli Lilly & Company" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
  In Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2010] EWCA Civ 33, all of these questions had to be considered before evaluating the validity of a patent owned by Human Genome Sciences (“HGS”). [read post]
Three zones of protection have thus been identified: the direct object of the invention (strict field and rejection of equivalents); the object of the invention (median field with obvious equivalents); the inventive idea (extended field with non-obvious equivalents) [5]. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
Still, you can’t blame the inventor for trying… The dispute in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly is, by comparison, a whole other kettle of fish. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:16 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
This time the action brought by Eli Lilly on French territory concerns the same drug but is directed against another generic commercialized by Zentiva. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
Limited and others v Yeda Research and Development Company Limited and others [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat) - the first application of Actavis v Eli Lilly in the Patents Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
 The UCL debate on the UK Supreme Court decision Actavis v Eli Lilly ("Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 78  [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs |  Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20… [read post]
14 May 2018, 12:30 pm
  Birss would not be drawn on his views of the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis (see the IPKat here - the 109 comments on the post is a good indication of how controversial this decision has been). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In general, proceedings in the field of mechanical engineering will be classified as “regular” and proceedings in the field of pharmaceuticals as “complex”. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:30 am by Nicholas R. Mattingly
Point - Counterpoint: The Debate Over Prior User RightsExactly who is to blame if a pharmaceutical company, say Eli Lilly, decides to invest billions of dollars and build a facility when they haven't adequately protected their own intellectual property? [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:36 pm
Having presided over major decisions impacting both on IP law and practice, not the least Actavis v Eli Lilly, Baron Neuberger will be sharing his insights and reflections on “IP in the UK and Europe – a view from the top”. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Unjust enrichment of pharmaceutical company towards health insurerMenzis / AstraZeneca, District Court of The Hague 14 October 2020 (Judge Knijff, Brinkman and Aalbers) [Dutch decision here]The second half of 2020 brought a remarkable decision in a case between health insurance company Menzis and pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The position of law which has consistently held the field for over a hundred years in the U.K. and for well over five decades in India, is that the business of a corporation is not the business of its shareholders. [read post]