Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 1 - 20
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 2:30 pm
Yesterday, on March 16, 2011, I had a field day. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 12:12 am
Lenka VÁLKOVÁ, Choice-of-Court Agreements under the EU Regulations in Family and Succession Matters (Wolters Kluwer / CEDAM, 2022), 548 pp., available for purchase here. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
50/00 P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council [2002] ECR I? [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
The present also provides useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign within the field of spiritual practice.BackgroundIn April 2018, Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation (the applicant) obtained an international trade mark registration designating the EU for the following figurative sign:The registration related to goods and services in Classes 16 (printed matter, instructional and teaching materials), 41 (education, providing of training and cultural… [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
SkyKick wanted to rely on the defence against Sky.SkyKick alleged that Article 1(13) was contrary to:Article 16 of the EU Charter (Freedom to conduct business);Article 17 of the EU Charter (Right to property);Article 20 of the EU Charter (Equality before the law); andArticle 21 of the EU Charter (Non-discrimination).SkyKick also relied on:Article 51 of the EU Charter (the field of application);Article 52 of the EU Charter (scope… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Brand owners outside the tobacco field are concerned with PP legislation spreading to other sectors. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Furthermore, according to NSC, members have been selected “to include renowned experts from three relevant fields of expertise, namely: physical-chemical characterization; environmental and biotic effects; and human health effects. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
The EU guidelines on SEPs do make reference to the Huawei v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
Second stage: addressing substantive issues As set out above, the US takes issue with the interpretations developed by the Appellate Body ("overreach") especially, but not exclusively, in the trade defence field. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
When the EU acts on education via one of these indirect routes, or when Member State action on education falls within the scope of EU law (as in Commission v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:14 am
The biggest news from today's Nokia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:02 am
Today, the CJEU has rendered its judgement in Slovak Republic v Achmea BV (Case C-284/16). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 4:57 am
Egypt for domestic investment laws and AAPL v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
Institute) has posted Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITS) and EU Law. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
Benedettelli, Cross-Border Insolvencies and International Arbitration in the EU: a Playing Field for Regulated Forum Shopping? [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:16 am
Code § 103).While AI has undeniably contributed to significant technological advancements, the current legal framework does not explicitly address whether AI can be considered a PHOSITA (Thales Visionix Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
The three that were particularly considered concerned:Corkscrews - El Hogar Perfecto V OHIM (T-337/12);Umbrellas - Senz Technologies BV v OHIM, (T-22/13 and T-23/13); andBiscuits - Biscuits Poult SA v OHIM (T-494/12).We were reminded that the only relevant sense to design law is sight. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
The application was for services in Classes 42 (Conducting scientific studies in the field of cardiovascular diseases) and 44 (Medical services in the field of cardiovascular diseases) of the Nice Classification.In November 2016, the EUIPO examiner rejected the application holding that the sign was devoid of any distinctive character under Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)).The applicant appealed the decision to the First Board of… [read post]
