Search for: "Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 4:00 pm
Edison Int’l and 2014 decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 1:26 pm
Hughes draws that elevated standard from Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
Supreme Court, which is much more conservative now than when it heard the Fifth Third Bank case (Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Wells Fargo & Co., 20-866Issues: (1) Whether, under Fifth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer, fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership fund are effectively immune from duty-of-prudence liability for the failure to publicly disclose inside information; and (2) whether Dudenhoeffer’s framework extends beyond prudence-based claims and applies to duty-of-loyalty claims against ESOP fiduciaries. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:22 am
At issue was the interpretation of the Court's holding in 2014's Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
Wells Fargo & Co., 20-866Issues: (1) Whether, under Fifth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer, fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership fund are effectively immune from duty-of-prudence liability for the failure to publicly disclose inside information; and (2) whether Dudenhoeffer’s framework extends beyond prudence-based claims and applies to duty-of-loyalty claims against ESOP fiduciaries. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
New Relists Doe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
In Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
Wells Fargo & Co. 20-866Issues: (1) Whether, under Fifth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer, fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership fund are effectively immune from duty-of-prudence liability for the failure to publicly disclose inside information; and (2) whether Dudenhoeffer’s framework extends beyond prudence-based claims and applies to duty-of-loyalty claims against ESOP fiduciaries. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
Click here to view as a PDF. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
Because these arguments concerned the interaction between the duties of plan fiduciaries under ERISA and the duties of corporate insiders under the securities laws, and the Court had previously indicated that the SEC’s views could be relevant to construing ERISA’s duty of prudence in this context (in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Whether Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:44 am
Under the Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:43 am
In Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Jander 20-289Issues: (1) Whether Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
The question presented in this case primarily concerned whether the “more harm than good” pleading standard, established in 2013 by the Supreme Court ruling in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
[Disclosure: The author of this post represented the plaintiffs in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:27 pm
The Court granted certiorari to review whether the Second Circuit correctly applied the Court’s “more harm than good” standard set forth in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
