Search for: "Figueroa v. Majors"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:46 pm
Photo by Dante Figueroa. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:02 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:19 pm
Figueroa. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
June 19, 2007) (holding that when the plaintiff provides the defendant with his personal information, the plaintiff cannot state a claim under the DPPA based on the defendant’s disclosure of the personal information); Figueroa v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Barnes and Figueroa v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
The defendants appealed on the basis that the damages award deviated materially from what was reasonable compensation and this week, in Figueroa v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
In each of the major U.S. cities, Medicare fraud is more preeminent among the ethnic communities. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Fortunately, the Reese court said, “no way, no how,” and joined the vast majority of courts refuse to allow common-law claims for failure to recall a product in the absence of any governmental edict. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Fortunately, the Reese court said, “no way, no how,” and joined the vast majority of courts refuse to allow common-law claims for failure to recall a product in the absence of any governmental edict. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Fortunately, the Reese court said, “no way, no how,” and joined the vast majority of courts refuse to allow common-law claims for failure to recall a product in the absence of any governmental edict. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Fortunately, the Reese court said, "no way, no how," and joined the vast majority of courts refuse to allow common-law claims for failure to recall a product in the absence of any governmental edict.For one thing, failure-to-recall claims are barred by the state of the art defense:[N]o common law duty exists. . .requiring a manufacturer to recall a product after the product has left the manufacturer's control. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:01 am
Fans of adverbs — and of statutory interpretation — might be interested in the case of Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm
That right to appointed counsel was confirmed by Justice Hugo Black writing for the majority in Gideon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
Much like Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:45 am
As detailed in this recent post, the Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (07-1372) — authority of a state to sell state lands Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:04 pm
There were two major rationales given. [read post]
