Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1 - 20 of 15,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
Board of Education and important figures related to the case using the Library of Congress collection, see: Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
This autocracy threat tracker is also available as a PDF file. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am by Eleonora Rosati
As a result, the Board of Appeal concluded that there was ‘only one difference, in the additional topstitching (composed of three wavy lines that curve around the back of the shoe) and the verbal element ‘PUMA BASKET’ next to a figurative depiction of a leaping cat present in the prior design, which are absent in the contested RCD’ (Case R 726/2021-3 para 58; in this respect, the decision of General Court in T-647/22 seems indeed challengeable as submitted… [read post]
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
In granting the motion, Justice Merchan rejected Trump’s argument that as the presumptive Republican nominee for president, he needs to be able to respond to political attacks and “criticize these public figures. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The Policing Board received a report last week which revealed up to 18 incidents of intrusive surveillance against media figures and legal professionals by the Police Service of Northern Ireland. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
“Sensitive” queries – such as queries using terms associated with elected officials, politicians, media organizations and figures, and religious organizations and figures – would require higher-level approvals, as would queries run using “batch job” technology (for a discussion of batch jobs, see the Privacy and Civil Liberties Board (PCLOB) 2023 Report on Section 702 at 101 and this explainer from Lawfare). [read post]
Unhelpfully, the court did not provide a justification for this figure, beyond noting that it had assessed the compensation “on an equitable basis”. [read post]