Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 181 - 200 of 12,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 12:57 pm by Colleen Chien
Indeed, it could fairly be said that the investigation figure I report is 50% higher than the ITC’s (28% v. 19%), and that the sample size is too small to draw any statistical conclusions. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:59 pm by Buce
But he's got a somewhat bewildering piece up  (I can't figure out his point, and I don't think he can either) about Vanguard v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:36 am
Making it even tougher than usual to figure out who the parents -- and what their respective rights -- really are.Interesting lineup of counsel as well. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:37 am
Lawyers are generally able to read statutes and rules to figure out basic procedural stuff.  [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 12:00 am by Paul Emile Trudelle
Santa Claus figures prominently in the decision in Baars v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (
If you can figure out the syntax of this post's headline, you've just figured out the rationale of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in E-L Enterprises, Inc v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Today's ruling in Case T-307/08 Aldi Einkauf v OHIM - Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (4 OUT Living) is a decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on an appeal by Aldi against a partially successful opposition lodged by Goya against its application to register a figurative sign, "4 OUT Living", in the face of a likelihood of confusion with an earlier Spanish figurative mark "Living & Co".If you click here you… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:40 pm by Lincoln W. Hobbs, Esq., CCAL
As promised, I'm trying to figure out, and to help others to figure out, what the new Davencourt v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm by Simon Gibbs
(Depending on what was included or excluded in the figures different firms managed to massage the figures and direct comparisons have never been possible.) [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 12:18 pm
This isn’t really appellate-related, but I figure that at least some of you must be, as I am, a Mac-using lawyer, and will find this of interest. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:41 am
Hästens chequered figurative markWhen it comes to figurative marks, distinctiveness very often plays a key role in determining whether such a mark is eligible for trade mark registration. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:19 pm by Steve Baird
When I snapped this photo over a month ago in Las Vegas, I figured it wouldn’t be much longer before we hear from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
It's very rare for an appellate court to find that an arms-length six-figure payment is insufficiently high to qualify as a good faith settlement under CCP 877.6 and -- on a writ, no less -- reverse the trial court's good faith finding as an abuse of discretion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm
You might think it would -- or at least should -- be relatively easy to figure would whether you can sue a utility for putting a light pole too close to the street, resulting in injury.If so, you'd be wrong. [read post]