Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 201 - 220
of 15,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2006, 11:08 pm
NY Times Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm
Here, the figures are even starker in terms of the reductions applied. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:45 am
The numbers are so staggering that it shocked even him: he had only estimated the figures in prior conversation before deciding to review his tax records. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:30 pm
The trial court allows the amendment, and the jury gives him a six-figure award, but the Court of Appeal reverses.Lawyer B, by the way, represented herself at trial. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:08 am
This practice raised lots of interesting questions about legal status, but was mostly a historical footnote, and I figured that the practice of suing non-humans (aside from rights-bearing legal fictions like corporations) was more or less defunct. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:28 am
[Pardon me for the lack of links right now; I'm in DC using a Mac, and can't quite figure out how to get the links to work -- I'll figure it out soon enough.] [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:57 pm
Indeed, it could fairly be said that the investigation figure I report is 50% higher than the ITC’s (28% v. 19%), and that the sample size is too small to draw any statistical conclusions. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:33 am
Today is the the last day of the 2009-09 Supreme Court term and a decision is expected in the New Haven firefighters case (Ricci v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
<> Hermes Consolidated, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 5:20 pm
It's fairly unusual for a high-profile, 84-page opinion to be per curiam rather than signed by its author.Yet here you go.I wonder if the author of the opinion prefers to remain anonymous, for professional or other reasons.Read the subject matter and try to figure out why the author of such a lengthy (and careful) opinion might want to just be part of a panel opinion.Rank speculation, of course. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:04 pm
Okay, if you can't figure out what happens, go ahead and read the opinion.But as they say, in death penalty cases, neither snow, nor rain, nor sleet, nor the decisions of the California Supreme Court or district court below . . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:45 pm
When the defendant delays paying a judgment, and accordingly must pay postjudgment interest, a portion of which is interest on the (six-figure) fee award, who gets the interest: the attorney or the client? [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:28 pm
"Jack: "You're a striking figure, yes. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:41 am
Getting two of the participants to flip was the nail in your (figurative) coffin.Sometimes that's the way the cookie crumbles. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:27 am
Nonetheless, when I read opinions like this one, I have a hard time figuring out which one I abhor more: the disgraceful rich people (like Swartz) who purchase these abusive tax shelters or the disgraceful rich people (like KMPG) who create and sell them.Tough call. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:38 pm
You'll just have to figure out what happened after it's all over.That's what the California Supreme Court holds today in a 5-2 decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
This figure is far beneath the amendment rates for other countries around the world. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
That $630,000 figure was down slightly from the $1.1 million the jury originally awarded in the case of Schedin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:36 am
Making it even tougher than usual to figure out who the parents -- and what their respective rights -- really are.Interesting lineup of counsel as well. [read post]
