Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 201 - 220 of 15,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 3:26 pm
Justice Richman says that the UM claim goes to arbitration, then we'll figure out later if there's any bad faith. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
At the center of all of this is Mayorkas, who has long been viewed as an enabling figure for illegal migrations. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
 In re Post Foods, LLC, 2024 USPQ2d 25 (TTAB 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:58 am by Laura
Thereafter, In W v H [2020] EWFC B10, the court discussed whether pensions should be divided based on capital value or income. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Yang analysed the recent judgment in Optis v Apple Trial E (one of six related trials), which focuses on the terms of a FRAND licence and the conduct of the parties in the negotiations.Marcel Pemsel reviewed the new book by Pierre Heuzé, written in French, entitled L'épuisement des droits de propriété intellectuelle sur un matériel biologique en droit suisse [Exhaustion of intellectual property rights in biological material under Swiss law]. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
  He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:55 am by Peter J. Sluka
Gardephe in the Southern District of New York, Melwani v Eagle Point Fin. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
Some of our friends are hard at work figuring out what comes next. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
Also, that a single trader in the sex toys business gets a monopoly to “love you” on account of a figurative mark “I LOVE YOU SINCE FOREVER” will raise some eyebrows (ours, for sure!). [read post]