Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 221 - 240
of 15,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 10:36 am
Making it even tougher than usual to figure out who the parents -- and what their respective rights -- really are.Interesting lineup of counsel as well. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm
Then, I figure my change jar is good for $500 easy, in a pinch. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:03 pm
Even if you figure out later that you should have said something else and amend the complaint.(2) If you're an attorney or law firm, make sure your fee agreement has a clause that says that the prevailing party gets its attorney's fees, including the value of any time spent by the law firm and its lawyers defending itself. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:06 am
In Steven Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe LLC, The buyer, who was a commercial real estate broker, sued the Sunnyvale neighbor, claiming that the neighbor defrauded them by falsely advising that they had no claims or interest with respect to the property. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 12:18 pm
This isn’t really appellate-related, but I figure that at least some of you must be, as I am, a Mac-using lawyer, and will find this of interest. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm
(Depending on what was included or excluded in the figures different firms managed to massage the figures and direct comparisons have never been possible.) [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
In Mason v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:20 am
The case is titled Air Dimensional, Inc., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:19 pm
When I snapped this photo over a month ago in Las Vegas, I figured it wouldn’t be much longer before we hear from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 9:58 am
I’m happy to say that the Ninth Circuit has just said “no,” in Pedroza v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Today's ruling in Case T-307/08 Aldi Einkauf v OHIM - Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (4 OUT Living) is a decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on an appeal by Aldi against a partially successful opposition lodged by Goya against its application to register a figurative sign, "4 OUT Living", in the face of a likelihood of confusion with an earlier Spanish figurative mark "Living & Co".If you click here you… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:40 pm
As promised, I'm trying to figure out, and to help others to figure out, what the new Davencourt v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
It's very rare for an appellate court to find that an arms-length six-figure payment is insufficiently high to qualify as a good faith settlement under CCP 877.6 and -- on a writ, no less -- reverse the trial court's good faith finding as an abuse of discretion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm
You might think it would -- or at least should -- be relatively easy to figure would whether you can sue a utility for putting a light pole too close to the street, resulting in injury.If so, you'd be wrong. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
The appellants in Coral Ridge Ministries v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:02 am
In Boemio v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
In Compton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:41 am
Hästens chequered figurative markWhen it comes to figurative marks, distinctiveness very often plays a key role in determining whether such a mark is eligible for trade mark registration. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm
v=Sbu26eaX0Xg Subscribe to my Video Channel: Bongiovi Law TV The post How to Start a Business in Las Vegas – Video Series appeared first on Bongiovi Law Firm. [read post]
