Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 221 - 240 of 13,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
An individual exercises his First Amendment right to criticize a public figure. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
Or even low-level "investments," like the ones here, where you're getting five figures from people in your church to market a dubious product on the basis of exceptionally dubious representations. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:06 pm
Here is the abstract.2012 marks the 80th anniversary of Donoghue v Stevenson, a case that is frequently cited as the starting-point for a genealogy of negligence. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
If you can figure out the syntax of this post's headline, you've just figured out the rationale of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in E-L Enterprises, Inc v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
This figure is slightly higher than the figure of 147 cases reported by Inforrm in January. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:01 am
The judgment in Charman v Charman will be handed down by the Court of Appeal today. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:09 am by Bexis
We previously blogged about the Pennsylvania Superior Court vacating an 8-figure in Polett v. [read post]