Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 261 - 280
of 13,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
To figure these things out. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:28 pm
Even if you read the caption, I bet you can't figure out what this case is about merely from the first paragraph. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:03 am
The Ninth Circuit reverses.I must say that it's sometimes difficult as a judge to "explain" why you're picking a certain figure for your "fee haircut" rather than a different figure. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:09 pm
Those are some bad, bad facts for the government.And since the opinion begins with those particular facts, you can probably already figure out which way the panel (unanimously) comes out. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:30 pm
When it reaches the Ninth Circuit, the panel that's drawn includes a district court judge sitting by designation from the SDNY and . . . two Ninth Circuit judges appointed by President Trump, Judges Nelson and Lee.You can probably figure out how the opinion turns out just knowing those facts.Look for an en banc call shortly. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
Here's yet another example of what weird results one sometimes gets from trying to figure out under the "categorical approach" whether a particular crime is a "crime of violence" under the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
(I could have added FHLB, but Judge Murguia doesn't use the acronym for that one.)Figure it out? [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
As well as trying to recover a seven-figure award of attorneys' fees even though he loses.No dice. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
(See request after the break.)USA v Petters Restitution [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:28 am
This figure was based on the number of devolution minutes lodged with the Advocate General’s office. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:06 pm
The post Calistoga Ranch Owner, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm
26 Jun 2015, 8:53 am
17 May 2011, 11:37 am
Lawyers are generally able to read statutes and rules to figure out basic procedural stuff. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm
Chapman v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:38 pm
And while Hustler Magazine v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:09 pm
Back in December, I posted about the Court of Appeals decision in Sony Electronics v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:55 pm
Based on an earlier US Supreme Court decision, Morrison v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:59 pm
But he's got a somewhat bewildering piece up (I can't figure out his point, and I don't think he can either) about Vanguard v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 7:16 am
You can read a case which talks about this issue in Denmark v. [read post]
