Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 281 - 300
of 15,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Ordinary Observer Test Is ‘The Sole Controlling Test for Determining Anticipation of Design Patents’
18 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
In Curver Luxembourg SARL v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:29 pm
Richards v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:59 am
Insider, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:32 am
Douglas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:02 pm
In Mandel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:57 am
Honestly, I have always figured they did. [read post]
Wisconsin: Taking Groundwater Is Not A Taking Of A Building Damaged By The Taking Of The Groundwater
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
If you can figure out the syntax of this post's headline, you've just figured out the rationale of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in E-L Enterprises, Inc v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
To figure these things out. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:28 pm
Even if you read the caption, I bet you can't figure out what this case is about merely from the first paragraph. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:04 pm
(See Cashion v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:03 am
The Ninth Circuit reverses.I must say that it's sometimes difficult as a judge to "explain" why you're picking a certain figure for your "fee haircut" rather than a different figure. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:57 pm
This figure is slightly higher than the figure of 147 cases reported by Inforrm in January. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
Figure 1, reproduced below, shows that brokers use broker stations 120 to transmit loan... [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:30 pm
When it reaches the Ninth Circuit, the panel that's drawn includes a district court judge sitting by designation from the SDNY and . . . two Ninth Circuit judges appointed by President Trump, Judges Nelson and Lee.You can probably figure out how the opinion turns out just knowing those facts.Look for an en banc call shortly. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:09 pm
Those are some bad, bad facts for the government.And since the opinion begins with those particular facts, you can probably already figure out which way the panel (unanimously) comes out. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
As well as trying to recover a seven-figure award of attorneys' fees even though he loses.No dice. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
Here's yet another example of what weird results one sometimes gets from trying to figure out under the "categorical approach" whether a particular crime is a "crime of violence" under the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
(I could have added FHLB, but Judge Murguia doesn't use the acronym for that one.)Figure it out? [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
One such figure is Pauli Murray. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
(See request after the break.)USA v Petters Restitution [read post]
