Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 301 - 320 of 15,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Figure 1, reproduced below, shows that brokers use broker stations 120 to transmit loan... [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:09 pm
 Those are some bad, bad facts for the government.And since the opinion begins with those particular facts, you can probably already figure out which way the panel (unanimously) comes out. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
 As well as trying to recover a seven-figure award of attorneys' fees even though he loses.No dice. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:30 pm
When it reaches the Ninth Circuit, the panel that's drawn includes a district court judge sitting by designation from the SDNY and . . . two Ninth Circuit judges appointed by President Trump, Judges Nelson and Lee.You can probably figure out how the opinion turns out just knowing those facts.Look for an en banc call shortly. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
Here's yet another example of what weird results one sometimes gets from trying to figure out under the "categorical approach" whether a particular crime is a "crime of violence" under the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
(I could have added FHLB, but Judge Murguia doesn't use the acronym for that one.)Figure it out? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 11:30 pm
OK, well, one).New figures show domestic abuse against men coming into the open - How times have changed...Financial remedy case adjourned after issue of husband’s capacity raised - The case TP v PRBP. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Enter the entertaining case of Williamson v Khan. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:37 am
  Lawyers are generally able to read statutes and rules to figure out basic procedural stuff. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
One interesting phenomenon on Twitter is the emergence of fake accounts, where someone pretends to tweet as a celebrity or political figure, usually to make fun of that celebirty or political figure. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:16 am
Adam Liptak wrote about the impending Supreme Court argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]